RuLes FOR Reviewing articles submitted for publishing at The Academic Periodical Journal titled “PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTE OF PHILOSOPHY, POLITICAL SCIENCE AND LAW NAMED AFTER A.BAHOVADDINOV OF THE NATIONAL  ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF TAJIKISTAN”

Articles coming to the editory board will pass preliminary expert examination (it is carried out by associate editors – specialists in the corresponding branch of science) and are accepted in accordance with the established procedure. Requirements to registration of the original are provided by article in "Rules for the authors" published in each issue of the journal.

The manuscripts issued not by rules aren't accepted by edition. Remarks according to the contents and registration of articles need to be eliminated before transfer of the text on reviewing.

Then articles are reviewed without fail by associate editors of the journal or experts of the corresponding specialty (candidates and doctors of sciences).

The review has to contain reasonable transfer of qualities of article, including scientific novelty of a problem, its relevance, factual and historical value, citing accuracy, style of a statement, use of modern sources, and also motivated transfer of its shortcomings. In the conclusion the general assessment of article and recommendation for an editorial board – to publish article, to publish it after completion, to direct on the additional review to the specialist in a certain subject, to reject is given.

Review volume – not less than one page of the text.

The article adopted to the publication, but needing completion goes to authors with remarks of the reviewer and editor. Authors have to make all necessary corrections to a final version of the manuscript and return to edition the corrected text, and also its identical electronic option together with the original version of the manuscript. After completion article is repeatedly reviewed, and the editorial board makes the decision on its publication.

Article is considered to be accepted to the publication in the presence of the positive review and if it was supported by associate editors. The order and sequence of the publication of article are defined depending on date of receipt of its final version.

Reviewing of the manuscript is carried out confidentially. Disclosure of confidential details of reviewing of the manuscript violates the rights of the author. Reviewers aren't allowed to make the copy of articles for the needs.

Reviewers, and also associate editors have no right to use in own interests information containing in the manuscript before its publication.